Course Datasets
All data used in this course — sources, formats, and download links
Overview
All datasets used in this course are either: 1. Provided directly in the course repository (coins and axes) 2. Open-access with downloadable files from published peer-reviewed research (Ogame jars) 3. Referenced from published research that requires institutional access (Bibracte ceramics — case study reading only)
For every dataset, the original source is fully cited. All data must be used for educational purposes only and cited appropriately in any work derived from this course.
Dataset 1: Roman Imperial Denarii
Artefact type: Roman silver coins (denarii)
Specimens: - Hadrian (r. 117–138 CE): 20 specimens - Antoninus Pius (r. 138–161 CE): 15 specimens
Format: TPS (landmark coordinates, 8 landmarks per coin)
Images: JPEG, standardized orientation (portrait right, die axis vertical)
Landmarks: 8 per coin (4 portrait points + 4 edge points at cardinal positions)
Source: UHK (Univerzita Hradec Králové) E-Learning Course — Modern Quantitative Methods and Shape Analysis in Archaeology (EU Operational Programme, reg. č. CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/16_015/0002427)
Files in repository:
data/coins/
├── DEN_Hadrian/
│ ├── Hadrian.TPS
│ └── [20 JPEG images]
└── DEN_AntoniusPius/
├── AntoniusPius.TPS
└── [15 JPEG images]
Used in: Assignment 2, Assignment 3, Module 5, Module 6, Module 7
Dataset 2: European Bronze Age Flanged Axes
Artefact type: Bronze Age flanged axes, Central Europe
Specimens: - G3 group: ~30 specimens (images in G3/ folder) - G4 group: ~35 specimens (images in G4/ folder)
Format: TIF images (white background) + TPS files + EFA coefficient files
Landmark data: Flanged_axes.TPS
Outline data: Flanged_axes_efa.dat (pre-computed EFA coefficients), Flanged_axes_efa_pca.dat (pre-computed PCA scores)
Source: UHK E-Learning Course (same as above)
Files in repository:
data/flanged_axes/
├── G3/
│ ├── [30 TIF images]
│ └── G3.TPS
├── G4/
│ ├── [35 TIF images]
│ └── G4.TPS
├── Flanged_axes.TPS
├── Flanged_axes.dat
├── Flanged_axes_efa.dat
├── Flanged_axes_efa_pca.dat
└── axes_metadata.csv ← geographic and typological metadata
Used in: Assignment 4, Module 8, Module 9
Dataset 3: Second Iron Age Ceramics from Bibracte
Artefact type: La Tène period ceramic vessels (complete profiles)
Site: Bibracte oppidum, Burgundy, France (capital of the Celtic Aedui tribe)
Period: Second Iron Age, 2nd century BC – 1st century AD
Specimens: 154 complete ceramic vessels with well-preserved cross-sections
Functional groups (8 types):
| Type | N |
|---|---|
| Plates | 35 |
| Dishes | 20 |
| Bowls | 24 |
| Cups | 18 |
| Goblets | 14 |
| Pots | 27 |
| Vases | 9 |
| Bottles | 7 |
Format: EFA coefficients (20 harmonics) derived from published archaeological drawings digitized at 1200 dpi. Typological metadata (vessel type) included in supplementary materials.
Source: > Wilczek, J., Monna, F., Barral, P., Burlet, L., Chateau, C., Navarro, N. (2014). Morphometrics of Second Iron Age ceramics — strengths, weaknesses, and comparison with traditional typology. Journal of Archaeological Science 50: 39–50. > DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.033
The raw EFA coefficients were not publicly deposited. The supplementary materials at the DOI above contain the corpus list and typological descriptors. The Bibracte dataset is used as a published case study reading in Module 10; the hands-on student exercise uses the Ogame jars dataset (Dataset 4 below).
Used in: Module 10 (reading and case study)
Dataset 4: Ogame Jars from Edo-Period Japan
Artefact type: Large stoneware storage/burial jars (Ogame, 大甕)
Site: 12 sites in northern Kyushu, Japan (Hizen and Chikuzen provinces)
Period: Edo period, c. AD 1600–1800
Specimens: 243 jars (standardized silhouette profile images)
Contexts:
| Site code | Site name | Context | N |
|---|---|---|---|
| FR | Furukameyashimo | Kiln | 89 |
| KM | Kameya | Kiln | 48 |
| MR | Maruya | Mortuary | 36 |
| NT | Nishitakagi | Mortuary | 21 |
| NS | Narasaki | Mortuary | 11 |
| MD | Mukaida | Mortuary | 12 |
| MT | Mitsutake | Mortuary | 10 |
| HK | Hakozaki | Mortuary | 4 |
| KS, KT, TJ, TK | Other mortuary | Mortuary | 12 |
Kiln sites total: 137 | Mortuary sites total: 106
Format: Standardized PNG silhouette images, one per jar (black vessel on white background). Metadata CSV (Ogame_Samples.csv) with sample ID, site code, and depositional context code (1 = Burial, 2 = Kiln).
License: CC-BY 4.0
Source: > Loftus, J. (2025). A Geometric Morphometric Dataset of Edo-Period ‘Ogame’ Jar Profiles from Northern Kyushu, Japan. Journal of Open Archaeology Data 13: 13. > DOI: 10.5334/joad.159 | Data: zenodo.org/records/15781166
Files in repository:
data/ogame_jars/
└── Ogame_GMM/
├── Ogame_Profiles_All/ ← 243 PNG silhouettes (all jars)
├── Ogame_Profiles_Site/
│ ├── FR/ ← 89 kiln jars (Furukameyashimo)
│ ├── KM/ ← 48 kiln jars (Kameya)
│ ├── MR/ ← 36 mortuary jars (Maruya)
│ └── [9 other site folders]
├── Ogame_Samples.csv ← metadata: sample ID, site, context code
├── Ogame_Sites.csv ← site metadata: coordinates, type, excavation dates
└── README.txt
The notebook for Module 10 downloads this dataset directly from Zenodo at runtime, so students do not need to manage the files manually.
Used in: Assignment 5, Module 10
How to Access Data in Colab
All data is available as a shared Google Drive folder. Instructions to mount it in Colab:
# Mount Google Drive (run once per session)
from google.colab import drive
drive.mount('/content/drive')
# Set the data path
DATA_PATH = "/content/drive/MyDrive/ShapeInTime_Data/"
# Example: load Hadrian TPS
hadrian = read_tps(DATA_PATH + "coins/DEN_Hadrian/Hadrian.TPS")Alternatively, you can upload data files directly to your Colab session:
from google.colab import files
uploaded = files.upload() # opens a file pickerCiting the Data
When using course datasets in your assignments or final project, cite the original source:
For coins and axes: > Morphometrics course materials. Modern Quantitative Methods and Shape Analysis in Archaeology. Univerzita Hradec Králové, Filozofická Fakulta. Project CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/16_015/0002427.
For Bibracte ceramics: > Wilczek, J., Monna, F., Barral, P., Burlet, L., Chateau, C., Navarro, N. (2014). Morphometrics of Second Iron Age ceramics — strengths, weaknesses, and comparison with traditional typology. Journal of Archaeological Science 50: 39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.033
For Ogame jars: > Loftus, J. (2025). A Geometric Morphometric Dataset of Edo-Period ‘Ogame’ Jar Profiles from Northern Kyushu, Japan. Journal of Open Archaeology Data 13: 13. DOI: 10.5334/joad.159